Fact Check: Mike Johnson allegedly said on hot mic it’d be ‘huge’ for GOP if SAVE America Act lowered voter turnout. Here’s the real story

Fact Check: Mike Johnson allegedly said on hot mic it’d be ‘huge’ for GOP if SAVE America Act lowered voter turnout. Here’s the real story

Claim:

Footage recirculating online authentically shows House Speaker Mike Johnson being caught on a “hot mic” telling Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry it would be “huge” for the Republican Party if the SAVE America Act decreased voter turnout to between 12% and 18%.

Rating:

What’s True:

Forbes posted a live video feed that did catch pre-event chatter between Johnson, Landry and U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, during which they could be overheard discussing the likely voter turnout in an upcoming Louisiana election. Shortened clips from that feed were then posted online with incorrect captions to give the impression they were discussing the SAVE America Act potentially reducing voter turnout.

What’s False:

The particular election they were discussing had nothing to do with federal matters like the SAVE America Act and pertained to Landry estimating an increase, not a decrease, in voter turnout. In the end, voter turnout for the election they were discussing ended up being higher than Landry’s 12%-18% approximation. At no point did any of the politicians say the SAVE America Act, or the SAVE Act as it was then called, would potentially cause a drop in voter turnout.

In early 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump and the Republican Party began a renewed push for the passage of the SAVE America Act, which had failed passage the previous year as the SAVE Act. The bill would require people to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote and approved identification when voting in all 50 states.

During this push, a video circulated online purportedly showing U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson speaking to Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a fellow Republican, about how it would be “huge” for their party if the SAVE America Act reduced voter turnout to between 12% and 18% of the electorate.

For example, one Instagram user posted the clip within a reaction video. The user claimed it showed Johnson being overheard on a “hot mic” asking Landry about expected voter turnout and remarking, when Landry answered between 12% and 18%, “that would be huge for us.” Notably, the person providing commentary in the video said Johnson was praising a decrease in voter turnout by that range, while the caption said Johnson was praising a potential 12% to 18% total turnout. The post read:

Speaker Mike Johnson got caught on a hot mic saying the quiet part out loud: the SAVE Act could drive voter turnout down to just 12% to 18% and that would be “huge” for Republicans.So let’s be clear, this bill was never about election security. It’s about voter suppression. Period. 🚨

The clip, as well as the claim that Johnson said low voter turnout would be good for Republicans, also spread on Facebook and Reddit (archived). One Reddit thread (archived) also claimed the footage showed Johnson being pleased with voter turnout dropping to between 12% and 18%.

While the clip of Johnson and Landry speaking originated from an authentic, longer video, the version in the posts was edited in such a way that it left out the context that the pair were speaking about a higher than usual expected turnout in a Louisiana-only election. That election had nothing to do with the SAVE America Act, which Congress is still yet to pass, as of this writing (archived), and none of the politicians involved in the conversation ever mentioned the bill.

Therefore, we have rated this claim as mostly false.

Origin of the video

On March 24, 2025, business magazine Forbes posted a livestream on YouTube featuring Landry and U.S. President Donald Trump holding a news briefing over Korean car company Hyundai’s decision to invest $5.8 billion for the development of a steel manufacturing factory in Louisiana. Landry posted photos on Facebook that same day, showing that he and Johnson were there for the announcement.

Johnson, Landry and other attendees, including Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., appeared around a lectern about 10 minutes before Trump arrived. While waiting for the president, the various attendees talked with each other. From the audience’s perspective, Landry stood to the right of the lectern, Johnson to its left and Scalise, who was also involved in the voter turnout conversation, stood to the left of Johnson.

From the 11th minute onward, Johnson and Landry could be heard — likely through the microphone on the lectern between them — discussing an amendment that was to be put to a public vote. Scalise and Landry then discussed something scheduled to happen on Saturday (March 29, 2025) and Scalise mentioned a council race in Jefferson Parish (parishes are essentially Louisiana’s name for counties).

On March 29, just a few days after the news briefing, Louisiana held elections that were largely local, except for a few statewide constitutional amendment votes. Landry encouraged voters to support the amendments. He noted in the conversation that he did not think opponents had spent so much money against an amendment in a long time.

Then, at the 11:39 mark in the recording, Johnson asked Landry about turnout for the March 29 election:

JOHNSON: What’s the anticipated turnout?LANDRY: Well, we thought it would be 12, but it looks like it may be 18%.JOHNSON: That’d be huge for an election. I mean, for an amendment vote.
For a Louisiana election date without major races beyond amendment votes, 18% is a reasonably high turnout, not a low one. For example, the most recent amendment vote before then, held Dec. 7, 2024, saw a turnout of only 11.3%.

The official voter turnout for the March 29, 2025, election wound up being almost double that, at 21.5%.

The proposed amendments were overwhelmingly rejected by voters. Following the results, Landry issued a news release blaming the defeat on “[billionaire George] Soros and far left liberals” for pouring “millions into Louisiana with propaganda and outright lies.”

At no point during the conversation between the three Louisianan politicians did anyone say the SAVE America Act, or the SAVE Act, as it was then called, would potentially cause a drop in voter turnout.

Sources:

Deng, Rae. ‘Why SAVE America Act Could Change How You Vote If It Passes US Senate’. Snopes, 19 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//tracker/senate-vote-save-america-act/.

Related Posts

Trump’s ICE Chief Caught Defending Indefensible at Explosive Congressional Hearing

A Government at a Standstill: Political Deadlock, Public Strain, and the Erosion of Trust In the thirty-third day of a partial federal government shutdown, the United States…

Trump LOSES IT After Cher EXPOSES Everything He’s Been Hiding On LIVE TV!

From Celebrity Outrage to Political Flashpoint: How a Viral Tirade Reignited America’s Debate on Leadership, Power, and Public Trust In an age where political discourse increasingly unfolds…

Trump MELTS After Mark Ruffalo HUMILIATES His Deceptions On Live TV!

Voices of Alarm: Celebrity Activism and the Politics of Fear in Modern America In an era where politics increasingly bleeds into every corner of public life, moments…

It’s official: Stephen Colbert is back—aпd this time, he’s calliпg the shots. After parting ways with CBS in a move that stunned viewers and sparked widespread debate across the media landscape, Colbert has returned with something entirely new, entirely bold, and impossible to ignore.

Aпd he’s пot doiпg it aloпe. Joiпiпg him is Jasmiпe Crockett—a risiпg political force kпowп for her direct voice, sharp wit, aпd fearless approach to pυblic discoυrse….

The momeпt Whoopi Goldberg barked, “SOMEBODY CUT HIS MIC!” — it was already far, far too late.

Becaυse by theп, Stepheп Colbert had already chaпged the eпtire temperatυre of the room. What begaп as a roυtiпe segmeпt oп The View had traпsformed iпto somethiпg volatile —…

U.S. inflation surged in March, pushed higher by the effects of the war in Iran

A week ago, during his address to the nation about the war in Iran, Donald Trump took a moment to repeat familiar and false claims about the U.S. economy….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *